Jump to content

User talk:Sgracanin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Sgracanin, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 01:41, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danube hidden heritage (November 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sgracanin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danube hidden heritage (November 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:15, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Danube hidden heritage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.interreg-danube.eu/uploads/media/approved_project_output/0001/25/04ef194aa8261ad94e733e9b4307601623f8ddfa.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danube hidden heritage (January 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Danube hidden heritage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.interreg-danube.eu/uploads/media/approved_project_output/0001/25/1b2717b823003ea5c8443183ed9ea4696a510ffc.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 06:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Danube hidden heritage has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Danube hidden heritage. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danube hidden heritage (July 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bradv🍁 04:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Brad. Please understand my continuous frustration with the incompetence this article has suffered from people who just did not care enough to give this article a PROPER review and/or provide good natured suggestions on how to make this article appear and get published in accordance to the convoluted value system that is being enforced by this site's editors. Thus, my rant. Perhaps it might invite a person with intellectual capacities beyond Taylor Swift to help get this article published. Here goes: I undestand that the EU might not be relevant to you. I also understand that Cultural Heritage might not be relevant to you. I also understand that seeing the GLOBAL significance of cultural routes, preserving Hidden Heritage and the fact that for THIS project over 1.6 Mio. Euro have been used to map out Hidden Heritage sites along the Danube and these will be used by Tourism organisations all over Europe to create and refine Cultural Routes where millions of people will travel down the Danube in order to experience various Heritage sites, as listed in this article, means NOTHING to YOU. I also understand that 3 follow up projects, which will build upon this project and use this site to expand Hidden Heritage sites and cultural routes means nothing to YOU. The fact that the EU and the European Commission found this Project to be relevant means NOTHING to YOU. Also the fact that over 100 people, scientists, cultural entities and 12 countries collaborated that this project happened, it also means nothing to YOU. What is the relevance of this article? It will be used by thousands of Touristic entities, workers, travel agents, ship route planners, Interreg Programme individuals, Touristic route planners, tourists, historians and who knows how many more people find this site relevant, but they all are not YOU. You are discriminating European Hidden Heritage, you are biased against Europe and European Union and frankly should not be tasked with any reviews that have to do with anything beyond popular culture. I request that someone with at least some sense and sensitivity for Hidden Heritage, Cultural Heritage and Culture, History and Science be tasked with reviewing this article. Almost ONE YEAR I am fighting here to find someone who is capable of understanding the importance of Hidden Heritage and THERE IS NOT A SINGLE PERSON available on Wikipedia with such a capacity. Wikipedia is truly a disgrace for the Encyclopaedias of the old. At least the Encyclopaedias of old used to care about Heritage, History and scientific work. Oh, and by the way, several of the authors that were listed in references collaborated and participated on this project. Thus the relevance of their inclusion. Sgracanin (talk) 12:58, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Danube hidden heritage, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Danube hidden heritage, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danube hidden heritage

[edit]

Hello, Sgracanin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danube hidden heritage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danube hidden heritage

[edit]

Hello, Sgracanin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danube hidden heritage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:12, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danube hidden heritage

[edit]

Hello, Sgracanin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danube hidden heritage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]