Jump to content

User talk:Philosopher/Archive 15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 20

Joining the January 2012 MtC drive

Well, welcome, but I saw that you forgot to add yourself to the logs subpage. The reviewers won't review what's not there. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 11:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, added self. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Commons/Drives/Jan 2012. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Please update the table, Mathis was sworn in [1][2]. I tried, but I screwed it up, I'm very anti-table, thanks, CTJF83 16:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for pointing it out. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

Feedback Dashboard upgrade

Hi Philosopher,

Thanks for signing up for the Feedback Dashboard response team! I wanted to let you know that the tool just got an important update (see here for details). I also wanted to invite you to the IRC office hours session that Steven and I are going to hold this Sunday, December 4. Hope you can make it and share your experience/questions with us! Thanks again, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite. I don't use IRC currently, so I won't be able to join you. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

I have asked for a deletion review of Kennedy Middle School (Cupertino, California). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Blue Ribbon evidence has been found which may force reexamination. Raymie (tc) 01:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I've commented there! --Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies)#US elementary schools: Inherent notability: for "Blue Ribbon Schools" as to whether the 5200 schools which have been found awarded the "Blue Ribbon" seal of approval get inherent notability, or if they each have to satisfy WP:ORG via significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources.I'm not sure if I'm supposed to notify those who commented at the AFD or the Deletion Review. I received no notification of the Deletion Review, and I was the one who initiated the AFD. I would have certainly had something to say at the Deletion Review, which was closed after 2 days. Edison (talk) 19:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Should the discussion I opened be made an "RFC?" I don't believe I've ever opened one and am not sure of the process. I'd like to see a wide input on this notability issue rather than just starting another AFD. Edison (talk) 19:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
The RfC tag seems to be used fairly often these days, so I think you could open it as an RfC - I don't think I've ever opened an RFC either, though I've helped close at least one. Thanks for notifying me about the discussion, btw, but I think I'm going to sit this one out - I support the idea of inherent notability for some subjects, but have no idea whether this subject is appropriate for inherent notability or not. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
As far as notification, Raymie should have notified you of the DR - and I should have noticed that that hadn't happened and notified you myself, sorry. Then again, I would have just undone the redirection on my own w/o a DR if I'd been asked, so... --Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

Law Practice Optimizers?

Here's some beer for you!

Hey Philosopher, I hope you're having a great day. As you are familiar with legal matters (according to your user page and my prior interactions with you, anyway), would you mind taking a quick look at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Law practice optimization to see if there is any encyclopedic potential with this article? Asking because I've never heard of "Law Practice Optimizers" before and it sounds like one of hundreds of non-notable consultancy "fields". This is in reference to User talk:CharlieEchoTango#Finding Citations; if you have any comments, and suggestions, I'd like to hear them. Best regards, CharlieEchoTango (contact) 17:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

I normally reply here, but since there's already a discussion there, I've replied at your talk. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Very nice of you, much appreciated. :-) CharlieEchoTango (contact) 02:45, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Quality: Low Coconut custard   Readership: High Quality: Low A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Lisa Carlton   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Joseph A. Palaia
Readership: High Quality: Low Edd Houck   Readership: High Quality: High Foreign relations of India
Readership: High Quality: Low Jamie Radtke   Merge
Readership: High Quality: Low Jeth   Readership: High Quality: Low National Air Transport
Readership: High Quality: Low Iowa Great Lakes   Readership: High Quality: Low Conference committee
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Chet (month)   Readership: High Quality: Low Scouting in New Hampshire
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Michael L. Fair   Add sources
Readership: High Quality: Low State Senator   Readership: High Quality: Low Claire Richards
Readership: High Quality: Low Shahrivar   Readership: High Quality: Low Baker v. Vermont
Readership: High Quality: Low Esfand   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Andrew C. Brock
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Peter Burling   Wikify
Readership: High Quality: Low Jeffrey Pierce   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Brandt Hershman
Readership: High Quality: Low Anthony Bucco   Readership: Medium Quality: Low California Christian College
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Senate Taiwan Caucus   Readership: High Quality: Low San Francisco Theological Seminary
Readership: High Quality: Low Ronnie Kroell   Expand
Readership: High Quality: Low Brent R. Appel   Readership: High Quality: Medium Christian Legal Society v. Martinez
Readership: Medium Quality: Low American Association of Christian Colleges and Seminaries   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Peter Nehr
Readership: High Quality: Low Quaker Mill Company   Readership: High Quality: Low Index of Iowa-related articles

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:45, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

In Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 81#Proposal for a new free image category, you said you were going to consider the idea and propose some changes at Commons. Are you still interested in doing that? Anomie 18:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks for reminding me. I'm a little busy in RL at the moment, so it may be a few days. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
That's fine, I'll be patient. Anomie 23:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Proposed at commons:Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Keeping track of Attribution requirements. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! One criticism though: I don't think that modifying {{Information}} would be the best way to do it on Commons; it should probably be done in the licensing templates instead. While you could do it in {{Information}}, that would require editing every image page on Commons to add the parameter and would require everyone to correctly specify the value of the parameter corresponding to the licensing tags.
I see my reference to {{Free media}} is confusing. Here on enwiki, every free license template contains {{Free media}}, which handles adding of Category:All free media. So the obvious thing to do here is modify that template to take a parameter and modify all the calls to it in the various licensing templates to pass that parameter. Of course, everything on Commons is supposed to be free media, so you probably don't have the equivalent in your licensing templates. You could create a helper template (along the lines of our {{Free media}}) to apply this category, or you could just have the appropriate licensing tags apply the category directly if that's how Commons likes to do things.
Most templates will be unambiguous, but some like commons:Template:Copyrighted free use provided that would need an extra parameter that the user needs to specify to indicate whether the "provided that" requires a link or not. Anomie 17:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

Talkback

Hello, Philosopher. You have new messages at MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist.
Message added 15:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

mabdul 15:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks For Introducing Me to wikipedia. Willdude 132 (talk) 09:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
A belated thank you! --Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

Lmatt AWB vandalism

I see that you gave Lmatt AWB access. Please take it away. His excessive vandalism is highly disruptive.

  • He changed the template Earthsatmosphere to Earth's atmosphere and then modified pages under a 1RR restriction. This is a simply a highly disruptive nonsense change. So far, he has only modified a few pages with this, but there are about 20 that might be affected.
  • He changed the cite templates on those same pages so they they no longer match the templates, similar to the following.
| title =
|title=

His editing is highly disruptive. Q Science (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

WikiProject Maps - File class articles

Hello Philosopher,

I'm stuck, I've manually created this category Category:File-Class_Maps_articles which successfully appears here Category:File-Class_articles&from=M

the reason I created the category is that the majority of items in Category:NA-Class_Maps_articles appear to be files - and all of those articles for example File_talk:1490_map.jpg&action=edit got tagged by the Bot as class=File, importance=NA which seems great.

However I had not already created the Category:File-Class_Maps_articles, so they all appear to show up as Category:NA-Class_Maps_articles which you'll see if you look at File_talk:1490_map.jpg

I've tried purging various pages, I've tried updating the documentation on the template, i've tried running the webform assessment update bot - and it's also run on it's own a few times (i think - or at least it's been a couple of weeks) and I've finally got to the point where I don't know which bit I didn't do in order to get that to work.

my last option (that I've not attempted out of fear of messing it up) might be to directly edit this page User:WP_1.0_bot/Tables/Project/Maps but that still doesn't explain to me why the File class articles end up in the NA class articles category.

I'm a bit confused to be fair - it all seems like it ought to work ok - but perhaps I 've missed something obvious and so I thought I'd ask you as you clearly know a fair bit about this sort of stuff. Sorry to be a burden. EdwardLane (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

My fault - I used the default categorization, not the extended version in the project template - meaning that it didn't know what to do with "File" and threw it in with everything else it didn't know what to do with in NA. I've expanded the template - it may take a bit for the database to update, but the articles should be in the right categories now. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks and it may have been my fault - as I probably didn't mention the extended categories when we started the thing up - but that was in ignorance of what files actually ought to be part of wp maps so no one at fault :) I just 'purged' a file and it appeared in the category correctly so it looks like it will get sorted over time now. Thanks very much. EdwardLane (talk) 11:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Just to let you know it's all now working fine - thanks EdwardLane (talk) 08:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
That's good to know. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:22, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

Thanks

for the barnstar! I'm glad the Iowa articles turned out well. Sgelbman (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Quality: Low Lunar precession   Readership: High Quality: Low Mack Mattingly
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Mark Sherman   Readership: High Quality: Low Shawn Mitchell
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health   Readership: High Quality: Low Poya
Readership: Medium Quality: Low John L. Valentine   Merge
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Ordibehesht   Readership: Low Quality: High United States Senate elections in Indiana
Readership: High Quality: Low She and Allan   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Tony Rand
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Phil Stong   Readership: Low Quality: Low Anthony E. Rand
Readership: High Quality: Low Tom Spencer (politician)   Add sources
Readership: High Quality: Low Farvardin   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Buzz Thomas
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Christa McAuliffe School   Readership: High Quality: Medium Iowa caucuses
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Paul Marin de la Malgue   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Mary Hodge
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Kenneth Kester   Wikify
Readership: High Quality: Low Fort Dodge Regional Airport   Readership: Medium Quality: Low KTTU-FM
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Silos & Smokestacks National Heritage Area   Readership: Low Quality: Low Teppakulam
Readership: High Quality: Low Jeffrey Atwater   Readership: Medium Quality: Low RGK Center for Philanthropy and Community Service
Readership: High Quality: Low David Wiggins   Expand
Readership: High Quality: Low Majority leader   Readership: High Quality: High Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Readership: High Quality: Low Common Traffic Advisory Frequency   Readership: High Quality: Low The Family Leader
Readership: High Quality: Low Flag of Iowa   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Roland Courteau

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

My Request For Rollback Permission

Hello Philosopher, I was just letting you know that I would like to request rollback permission. I would mainly want to use it for reverting things that are vandalism. I have done this in the past with Twinkle, but I have heard that this interface is much better. See my history for details. Thanks!
--RubinkumarTalk 22:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Replied at your talk. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:22, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Just so you know, if you look my contributions, and switch to the 500 edits per page view, you can see that I have nominated around 30 pages for CSD, as I have warned vandals about 25 times making the total amount around 55. --RubinkumarTalk 15:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Replied at your talk. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en@lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox officeholder/awards

Template:Infobox officeholder/awards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

21:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, January 2022

Bots Newsletter, January 2022
BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Wikipedia's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.

Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost two years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.

Overall
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 BRFAs. Of these, Green checkmarkY 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with Dark red X symbolN2 8 denied, Blue question mark? 2 withdrawn, and Expired 2 expired).

January 2020

A python
A python
A python
0.4 pythons
Yeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.

February 2020

Speaking of WikiProject Molecular Biology, Listeria went wild in February

March 2020

April 2020

Listeria being examined

Issues and enquiries are typically expected to be handled on the English Wikipedia. Pages reachable via unified login, like a talk page at Commons or at Italian Wikipedia could also be acceptable [...] External sites like Phabricator or GitHub (which require separate registration or do not allow for IP comments) and email (which can compromise anonymity) can supplement on-wiki communication, but do not replace it.

May 2020

We heard you like bots, so we made a bot that reports the status of your bots, so now you can use bots while you use bots

June 2020

A partial block averted at the eleventh hour for the robot that makes Legos

Conclusion

  • What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
  • Will Citation bot ever be set free to roam the project?
  • What's the deal with all those book links that InternetArchiveBot is adding to articles?
  • Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
  • What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


21:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

19:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

19:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

22:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
  • Christmas Island AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
  • Philadelphia GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
  • United Nations Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
  • SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
  • United Nations Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

21:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

22:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

16:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

19:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

21:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
  • When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous