Jump to content

User talk:CourtauldGill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, CourtauldGill! This is your Talk page, where other Wikipedia users might drop you a message from time to time related to any edits you make. You'll notice that we have dropped a 'badge' on this page, which shows that you are involved in the Conway project. Thanks for taking this first step!  If you reply here, please make sure you type in {{U|ConwayDigi}} to your message  which will give us a notification. Thank you! - ConwayDigi

Projects

This user is a participant in WikiProject Conway Library

CourtauldGill, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi CourtauldGill! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


June 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Amanda Simpson, from its old location at User:CourtauldGill/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 19:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amanda Simpson (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 19:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ethel Smyth has been reverted.
Your edit here to Ethel Smyth was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/ethelsmyth/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Marino Malone (June 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 12:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Marino Malone has been accepted

[edit]
Carolyn Marino Malone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 21:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:All Saints Parish Hall has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:All Saints Parish Hall. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Francis Robert Kelly has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Francis Robert Kelly. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francis Robert Kelly has been accepted

[edit]
Francis Robert Kelly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, CourtauldGill. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 10:43, 13 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Francis P Kelly, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Not a problem link, see WP:NOTBROKEN. David Biddulph (talk) 16:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi CourtauldGill! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Francis Robert Kelly / Francis P Kelly - mixup?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: All Saints Parish Hall has been accepted

[edit]
All Saints Parish Hall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eve Borsook has been accepted

[edit]
Eve Borsook, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delia Gaze has been accepted

[edit]
Delia Gaze, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 23:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allan Braham has been accepted

[edit]
Allan Braham, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 00:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi CourtauldGill! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I get an existing image in my article to appear top right?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ethel Booty has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ethel Booty. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ethel Booty has been accepted

[edit]
Ethel Booty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 23:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter H Brieger has been accepted

[edit]
Peter H Brieger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 15:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, CourtauldGill! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


August 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Charles Winmill, from its old location at User:CourtauldGill/sandbox-y. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Winmill has been accepted

[edit]
Charles Winmill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francis P Kelly has been accepted

[edit]
Francis P Kelly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata

[edit]

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q98637960 :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Emilia Rensi, from its old location at User:CourtauldGill/sandbox-z. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to drafts

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Giuseppe Rensi. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. An edit has converted these links, into links to the not-currently-existing page (redlinks) where the draft will be placed if it is eventually accepted. Thus the links will automatically become valid links aimed at the correct target when and if the draft is accepted. Thank you. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies DES and thank you for explaining. CourtauldGill (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. No one learns everything about Wikipedia quickly. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 12:55, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Dillian Gordon, from its old location at User:CourtauldGill/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Malcolm Thurlby (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Green Room Club (talk) Add sources
30 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Nonet (music) (talk) Add sources
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bloodaxe Books (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Hermann Zilcher (talk) Add sources
57 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Carl Reinecke (talk) Add sources
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C History of sonata form (talk) Cleanup
50 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Army and Navy Club (talk) Cleanup
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919 (talk) Cleanup
121 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Foreign relations of Canada (talk) Expand
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start University Women's Club (talk) Expand
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Franghiz Ali-Zadeh (talk) Expand
55 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Gyaru-moji (talk) Unencyclopaedic
406 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Al Jazeera English (talk) Unencyclopaedic
65 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Chalk Farm (talk) Unencyclopaedic
451 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA SOAS University of London (talk) Merge
34 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Charles Wuorinen (talk) Merge
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Mid-office travel automation (talk) Merge
107 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Rape in English law (talk) Wikify
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Aleksandra Vrebalov (talk) Wikify
47 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Jane Hirshfield (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Andrew Morrogh (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub BS 7988 (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bungawalbin State Forest (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Malka (river) (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Clarinet trio (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mihály Mosonyi (talk) Stub
23 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Mark Ford (poet) (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Sir Lynch Cotton, 4th Baronet (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ailbhe Darcy (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emilia Rensi has been accepted

[edit]
Emilia Rensi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 20:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dillian Gordon has been accepted

[edit]
Dillian Gordon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 09:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List formatting

[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your contributions to wikipedia. Something I have noticed in a few of your articles is that you have lists of publications that are not formatted as lists. Please note that if you put an asterisk * before the item when editing, this will format it as a bulleted list. Thanks Melcous (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]