Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 November 11
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 10 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 12 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 11
[edit]15:02:34, 11 November 2016 review of submission by SamBloomfield
[edit]
Is there any way someone can give me specific issues with the article I am trying to publish. It is not clear to me why the article was rated "Start".
SamBloomfield (talk) 15:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- The "grading scheme" gives some insight, including editing suggestions for "Start" quality articles: "Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use." The article to which you refer could use a good bit of copy/edit and a few sections don't have a citation. On the other hand, I create quite a few articles, including articles I'm quite proud of, and they are almost always graded as "Start". I don't think of it as a reflection on my work, just as encouragement. Smmurphy(Talk) 15:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- I would suggest not worrying much about the "grading scheme". It is entirely subjective, except for featured articles and good articles which have formal assessment criteria. (A few WikiProjects have assessment schemes.) I have never seen a deletion discussion in which someone argued that an article should be deleted because it was Start-Class or kept because it was C-Class or B-Class. I personally think that the grading scheme is a distraction from the serious business of improving articles by adding reliable sources and expanding subject coverage, and the extent to which articles can be improved depends on the topic. (That is, some articles will never be better than Stub-class, but should be kept anyway. If there is one source that mentions one person in passing in an account of the year 732 CE, that is enough for the person to be notable, and the article will never be more than a stub.) I wouldn't worry about the grading scheme (and think that an argument can be made for getting rid of most of it). Robert McClenon (talk) 15:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
I am trying to add the compay WFS Technologies.
It says that I need more references, which I shall look for, but I would also like to add a photo of the building, but cant find where to download one
Can you point me in the right direction?
Thanks
JohnHowes (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, John. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Most people in your situation simply take a photograph themselves and then upload it to the Commons site. Be advised that, in doing so, you will be releasing the photograph into the public domain. For more information on this, see the tutorial at Commons:First steps. I hope this was helpful. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC)