Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 June 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 08:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Table tennis at the 2016 Summer Olympics uses a different table with the same information already. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

WFA Templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 08:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no information on the 2016 template nor a mainspace for it. The 2020 template is useless as the Women's Football Alliance canceled the 2020 season in response to the pandemic. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Anthony Bradbury (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a less useful and incomplete version of {{US officer ranks}} which includes more services and grades. It also has limited use, being used on 3 pages and should be deleted. Terasail[✉️] 18:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These rugby union squad templates are for non-professional sides, or for sides in non-notable competitions. They also haven't been maintained and I can't see a reason for keeping them. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Should Leeds in particular get back into Championship in future it can be restored then.Skeene88 (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - Considering how few of the links in these three templates are blue, that tells me pretty much everything I need to know about whether we actually need a navbox to get between these players. – PeeJay 18:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all the point of these templates is to navigate between players in the squad. As they're not in professional leagues, there won't be enough players with articles to justify the templates. We've deleted similar templates for other sports teams in similar situations. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 21:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is for something that is going to happen two years down the road for an event happening in six years. It shouldn't be kept waiting around just in case the event will happen. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 21:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what rugby tournament this is for, but it remains unused and serves as a scorecard for games, which templates should not be used for. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 21:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information already exists on the mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 21:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information already exists on the mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 22:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information already exists on the mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 22:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used and no mainspace article exists for it to be used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --Trialpears (talk) 22:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by Template:2020 Major League Soccer Western Conference table which contains accurate information and is used on respective pages. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the supposed benefit of this template is that it has points per game (PPG) listed. But as the other template also has PPG listed, they are now duplicates of each other. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All remain unused. The first template's information exists on the mainspace it was created for. The latter two don't have a mainspace article it was created for. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:DYK user topicon. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 01:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:DYK user topicon 3 with Template:DYK user topicon.
topcicon 3 has an optional hook parameter which can be added if in use and topicicon1 allows the changing if the icon svg with the parameter. No need for 3 templates here. Gonnym (talk) 12:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. No opinion on whether to merge, but if they are merged, make sure a bot comes through to ensure the appearance is unchanged. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 08:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The event was cancelled, so no article on en.wiki would need this template (2020 Thailand Women's Quadrangular Series redirects to International cricket in 2019–20). This was at a recent TfD in a massive batch of other templates, but that shouldn't preclude a discussion on just this one template Joseph2302 (talk) 08:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. Information already featured on the Premier League of America article under the 2016 playoffs section. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).