Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Reason: Political article that appears to have had biased information on it. Moreover, the article appears ripe for an edit war and paid writers on it could be possible. Holyapple25 (talk) 03:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Addition of unsourced content again and again by IPs and new user. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Highly obscene and unnecessary messages by IP - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thewikizoomer&oldid=1246488973. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continued re-insertion by IPs of an image which is most likely a copyright infringement. TarnishedPathtalk 09:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Koopinator (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: False information has been added to the page multiple times, including reference to a nonexistent 'Corporate Communication Manager' named Aidan Ashford and to a nonexistent sub-brand called 'Trade Republica'.
It looks like these changes are being made in order to lend credence to phishing campaigns targeting Trade Republic customers. The supposed 'Trade Republica' branding in particular is similar to phishing domains targeting customers that we have previously identified. We have already reverted these changes several times, but they are quickly added again by the same user, 'Roger Jason Bennett', who has also added a reference to an 'Aidan Ashford' to the page for the European Securities and Markets Authority. Endmost wiki (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism related to https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/indonesia-fufufafa-social-media-gibran-rakabuming-raka-prabowo-subianto-4615471 . Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumed dynamic IP same disruption. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 16:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection is not appropriate for issues with single IPs. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I requested this page protection request August 30th 19:59 US Eastern on the subject's talk page and was told that they do not protect pages unless there is a high level of vandalism or disruptive activity. I've been carefully following this page's edits for the past twenty days and there has been a high level of disruptive editing. I strongly advise Wikipedia moderators and admins to discuss protecting this page. Butterscotch5 (talk) 17:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think you mean September 11 attacks, because the redirect you listed has only been edited 3 times. Babysharkboss2!! (No Life 'Til Leather) 17:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Seems obvious. Request changed accordingly. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Article already semi-protected, and the troublesome editor appears to have stopped. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: high level of vandalism Cynthiakaui (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: An IP address continues to make changes describing Meyer as a convicted felon who is on the run. The news articles in question do describe issuing a warrant, but there is no phrasing describing her as convicted felon. This article has had issues over the years (see the talk page), and I expect this behavior will continue moving forward. DaffodilOcean (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 18:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)