Jump to content

Warrant: The Current Debate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Warrant: The Current Debate
AuthorAlvin Plantinga
LanguageEnglish
SubjectEpistemology
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication date
1993
Publication placeUnited States
Pages228
ISBN978-0-19-507862-6
121/.6
LC ClassBD161 .P58
Followed byWarrant and Proper Function 

Warrant: The Current Debate is the first in a trilogy of books written by the philosopher Alvin Plantinga on epistemology. Plantinga introduces, analyzes, and criticizes 20th-century developments in analytic epistemology, particularly the works of Roderick Chisholm, Laurence BonJour, William Alston, Alvin Goldman, and others.[1] In the 1993 book, Plantinga argues specifically that the theories of what he calls "warrant" – what many others have called justification (Plantinga draws out a difference: justification is a property of a person holding a belief while warrant is a property of a belief) – put forth by these epistemologists have systematically failed to capture in full what is required for knowledge.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Plantinga, Alvin (1993). Warrant: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.