User talk:Viewmont Viking

Welcome!

Hello Viewmont Viking, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. McDoob AU 93 23:30, 10 June 2012

James Burke edit

Reverting of my James Burke amendment - the story of Burke copying his classmate is true! I am the son of the classmate! So I heard it straight from the horse's mouth, why is it reverted? Dirk Wickenden (talk) 13:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You failed to provide a reliable source. Canterbury Tail talk 13:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the reliable source? Dirk Wickenden (talk) 14:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No you are not, and neither is your parent. Fails Wp:RS. Canterbury Tail talk 14:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been given all the information you need on your talk page. By continuing to claim that you either do not know what you are doing, do not understand, and continue to argue with well established editors, you are causing a disruption to Wikipedia. If you choose to be, as you say a martyr, we are not stopping you. You can choose not to edit Wikipedia, or you can choose to review what has been shared with you learn from it and start anew following the guidelines established.--VViking_TalkEdits 14:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viewmont Viking, that is a harsh response to a very new editor. Don't be bitey, established editors should instruct editors unfamiliar with Wikipedia's many guidelines, not drive them away from the project so they now have a bad attitude about Wikipedia and its editors. We were all new once. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liz I appreciate the work you do with Wikipedia. I can see how people could view this edit as harsh/bitey. I am not going to "make excuses" for this edit, only to say that I could have written it differently and in a less bitey way, but I stand by the premise of the message. I will try to be less bitey in the future.--VViking_TalkEdits 13:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond, North Yorkshire

Sorry, but you have been reverted by HazzelDazzleDoDah. At no point did I admit to anything being incorrect. That is just wrong. Sorry. We are slogging it out on the user's talk page. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 15:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what I said is it? I said you didn't know it to be correct, which is what you did say... HazzelDazzleDoDah (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be real, at this point the stupid I'm having to deal with from numerous angles is getting tiring and I have far more important things to do. Enjoy the rest of your day. HazzelDazzleDoDah (talk) 15:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does this add ?

It adds that you can hear the person talk, argue, and explain. It adds to the profile by delineating the career and specific scholarly approach of the scholar. Just like the entry on German philosopher Jürgen Habermas has links to two youtube interviews he gave; or the one on French sociologist and philosopher Michael Foucault has a link to the Foucault Audio Archive of the University of California, Berkeley. I could continue this ad libitum. Psychedilly Circus (talk) 18:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User page rate request.

Hello, VV (can I call you that?). I'd like you to tell me if my new user page is fine now, since you deleted it without notifying me last time. Tell me if I should add or remove anything. Thanks! From Rushpedia, the free stupid goofball (talk) 16:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Little help

Hey. Being as that you know what is going on. Can you help me out with editing? I know you sent links. What I had changed was revenue and other financials from 2019 to 2024 numbers and citing Bloomberg and Yahoo. I'm not sure how that is promotional. The Awards changes were also making updates to what was there and I put cites to the pubs. Maybe its because I'm doing the edits a little bit at a time? Any advice would be appreciated as I'm new here and learning. Thanks, Mike Mike.dill01 (talk) 21:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First off do you have a COI? If you do my advice would be the same as what @WikiDan61: said on his talk page to make edit requests at Talk:Ryder instead of editing the article directly. If you cannot see how your edits could be construed as promotional there really isn't much, I feel I can do to help you. Saying all you did was update the revenue and other financials, then removing whole cited paragraphs that could be considered negative about the organization seems very disingenuous.--VViking_TalkEdits 21:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I do not have a COI, maybe that is the easiest route. What I removed was errant in that Ryder does not operate in UK. But I get it. Thanks for your time and help. Mike.dill01 (talk) 22:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi Viewmont, our contribution has been undone because they appeared to be promotional. (Sledding) We provided independent information from public media and a public Ski Resort page about a new sports oportunity for an alpine experiene on slopes for all with a new carving bob catagory. This is an independant and saisonal relevant infirmation for the public. Please advice, how to contrivute innovation, where the market did not offer alternatives yet. Many thanks and best wishes. Mic TheMsee (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TheMsee The help me tag you used attracts the attention of any interested editors; as you are addressing this user specifically on their own user talk page, I have removed the Help Me tag. 331dot (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:RS--VViking_TalkEdits 13:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About Bilibili

Hello.

I have a question about your edit on the Bilibili page. Your reason for remove my edit was ‘Unsourced, promotional, poorly sourced’. In accordance with WP:RS and WP:DEPS, I am confident that Xinmin Weekly and Xinhua News can serve as reliable sources on this topic, and as this entry has already described the criticisms related to Bilibili, and in the interest of providing readers with comprehensive information for a better understanding, I thought it would be appropriate to also provide information on Bilibili's contribution to society. The comments on Bilibili in the content (or perhaps what you consider to be alleged promotion) come from the referenced sources. Also, I edited the content with reference to the Chinese Wikipedia, and attached the link here for your information.

In addition, I am new to the English Wikipedia so may not be very familiar with them, so if you find a problem with what I say, please let me know and attach the relevant guidelines and relevant community discussions so that I can understand them, thank you.

Sincerely, Iming (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]