User talk:Sleath56

Archives

I

This user participates in
WikiProject Greece.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Significant omissions in edit summaries

I'm concerned that you have been making edits with undescriptive edit summaries. They often add a large amount of text, but also remove well-sourced content (specifically, content unwelcome to the People's Republic of China), and the latter fact is not mentioned in the edit summaries. For instance, removing content on Ai Weiwei with the edit comment "Expand and revise", and removing information about the use of the song "Mo li hua" in antigovernment protests with the edit comment "Revise and expand", and removing imagery and captions on Hellenistic influence on areas that are now in Xinjiang Province from the Hellenistic Period article with the edit comment "Add citations". This is not an exhaustive list.

Your edit summaries must accurately reflect your edits. Not mentioning significant alterations to article content is unacceptable. It hinders proper peer review of your work. I will manually request peer review of your edits to try and make up this deficiency, but please make sure that your edits summaries are accurate and complete in future. HLHJ (talk) 19:04, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]