User talk:Lolzer3000

Welcome!

Hello, Lolzer3000, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Lolzer3000, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft

Consider requesting that Draft:2023 South Dusable Lake Shore car crash be deleted, as there is no information that suggests it can meet Wikipedia's standard for notability. To do so, put at the top of the draft, inside double curly brackets {{ }}, Db-author. This will request an Administrator to delete the draft. David notMD (talk) 21:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i mainly used this for a sketch article to use the different features of Wikipedia without having to edit because i didnt know how to use them at the time, will do. Lolzer3000 (talk) 14:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citation FYI

Hi Lolzer

I was reading through 2024 in aviation and noticed that David E. Harris's death hadn't been properly cited. I fixed it now, but as you added them I wanted to mention it and give you a few pointers on how to properly cite stuff.

Firstly, I suggest you be more specific, so instead of "MSN" or "NPR" say "Blair, Elizabeth (13 March 2024). "The first Black pilot of a commercial airline has died at 89". NPR. Retrieved 14 March 2024.", for example. You want to give it as much detail as you can so it's as clear as possible to someone viewing where you got the info.

Secondly, you need to link the article itself, rather than just the network. You only linked "www.MSN.com", so as soon as the article you saw was off the front page, I could't go and verify it. Like, imagine I tried to cite www.bbc.co.uk for something, as opposed to https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68643137. The second link will work until the article is taken down, but the first will stop being useful as soon as more news happens, which it probably will.

I don't mean to sound rude or anything, I just wanted to give you some advice to make sure you don't make the same mistake in the future. :) SqueakSquawk4 (talk) 22:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 South Dusable Lake Shore car crash

Hello, Lolzer3000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 South Dusable Lake Shore car crash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1999 Namibian Defense Forces Helicopter collision (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1999 Namibian Defense Forces Helicopter collision and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 15:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alaska Air Fuel (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alaska Air Fuel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 South Dusable Lake Shore car crash

Hello, Lolzer3000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2023 South Dusable Lake Shore car crash".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1947 Cressingham Mid Air Collision (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1947 Cressingham Mid Air Collision and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cessna 5Y-NNJ

Howdy! You recently added this picture of Cessna 5Y-NNJ to the Safarilink Aviation Flight 053 article, which is great. However, it would be helpful to caption the photo with the date it was taken, but the creation date per Wikimedia Commons is 6 Sep 2024, which is not possible because the aircraft was thoroughly destroyed in March 2024. Can you please edit the file data to show the actual date the photo was taken? Carguychris (talk) 21:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permission

Just to expand on this discussion @Lolzer3000: Are you sure that this photo is your own work? The image seems to be copyrighted and comes from Peter Leu who posted it on Flugzeug.bild. Images that are on the website are copyrighted – [1] – so I'm just wondering if you have permission to use it or not. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 08:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviationwikiflight. I've nominated the image for deletion because this User says its from his work yet he took it from here ==> [2]. Was it the right move? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

my IP account here, this was taken from the ASN dialouge, no image credit was given and i didnt figure to go find where it was from @Aviationwikiflight 75.174.150.56 (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read this. ==> [3]. <== Read that. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that an image not having a copyright tag doesn't necessarily mean it is free to use. I would suggest next time to perform an image search and see if it is possible to find information regarding the image. Cheers. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apoligies, i'll figure out how to properly use copyright for images, shouldnt be too hard. @Aviationwikiflight Lolzer3000 (talk) 14:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]