Jump to content

User talk:Hazelmelba2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hazelmelba2, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Hazelmelba2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arakan Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arakan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 13:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attacking other users

[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing deliberate factual errors

[edit]

Hello, I'm 203.81.175.247. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lying

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, some of your recent edits have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, you may be blocked from editing. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add defamatory content, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 203.81.175.247 (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

[edit]

Your recent editing history at Burma shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Vacationnine 18:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Improper use of templates

[edit]

Please refrain from templating established users. Your edits appear to be uncivil and have been reverted. If you would like to warn or notify users, please discuss reasonably. Thank you.


Please stop. If you continue to leave warning templates on established users' talk pages, you will be blocked from editing.

Blocked

[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or submit a request for unblock to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Sockpuppetry

[edit]

January 2013

[edit]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.81.175.247 (talk) 01:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hazelmelba2. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Welcome to MILHIST

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Min Aung Hlaing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese military, Golden Triangle and Irrawaddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 18:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]