User talk:Arthur Vritra

Welcome!

Hello, Arthur Vritra, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 19:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nedu Wazobia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NYSC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Peter Wilt, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. —ShelfSkewed Talk 03:14, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yellow Ribbon (movement), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian occupation of Ukraine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quite frankly, the article's previous status was anything but neutral. As for commentary, personal analysis or a subjective point of view, every sentence I added in the article had a reference. This begs the question of how any material I added could be from my point of view, when they were written by individuals I have absolutely no interaction with except by the way of reading their articles. Arthur Vritra (talk) 17:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

MrOllie (talk) 11:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Arthur Vritra and Solana (blockchain platform). Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:22, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Solana (blockchain platform)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 15:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arthur Vritra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for making edits to the Solana (blockchain platform) on the claim that the edits made were promotional. While the content I added could certainly be viewed in a positive light, it does not qualify as promotional as every single sentence added was referenced. My appeal is based on the fact that the block was inappropriate as the edits to the page were necessary.

Decline reason:

You seem to think that just because your edits were referenced, they are not promotional, that's not the case. In any event, you are blocked for disruption and gaming the system to obtain an advanced permission for the express purpose of editing the article at issue. The system exists for a reason. You are free to edit literally every other article and page on Wikipedia. You may also propose edits on the talk page of the single article you are blocked from. 331dot (talk) 22:22, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocking admin comment, the partial block was for disruption and gaming edit confirmed to immediately access a protected page. Arthur Vritra, you are able to edit every other type of page in the project. Star Mississippi 18:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]