Jump to content

User talk:47.19.209.230

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (47.19.209.230) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Severestorm28 13:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: December 2015 tornado outbreak has been accepted

[edit]
December 2015 tornado outbreak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Andrew5 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrew5. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 12:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.19.209.230 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This IP last edited on 6/23 and it was blocked on 7/20. The investigation should have concluded this IP was “stale” and should not be blocked. Besides it applies to both a Bloomingdale’s and Macy’s at Walt Whitman Mall, so there is collateral.47.19.209.230 (talk) 20:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Amazing how "coincidentally" similar these unblock requests are. Yamla (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.19.209.230 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Probably because we all share the same frustration lol. We were blocked on insufficient evidence. 47.19.209.230 (talk) 21:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Still evading block, so, no, no unblock. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 22:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.19.209.230 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

LISTEN HERE WIKIPEDIA. EITHER YOU ACCEPT THAT THERE IS TOO LITTLE EVIDENCE FOE A BLOCK, OR I GIVE YOU EVIDENCE THIS BLOCK IS NEEDED BY VANDALIZING YOU WITH A HUNDRED ACCOUNTS!! 47.19.209.230 (talk) 18:43, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQLQuery Me! 18:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Due to your last threat, I've removed your ability to edit this page. SQLQuery Me! 18:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyobons mots 21:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]