User talk:204.40.130.131

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Politics of Europe. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Thank you for your contributions! Lupin VII (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Japanese Canadians, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Notability is best demonstrated by the subject having their own article. If they do not, they are probably not notable enough for inclusion. Ifnord (talk) 15:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October '24

Hello, I'm Babysharkboss2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(I spread pro-Weezer propaganda)} 14:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Independent sources were referenced. Did you review the sources? Please review politician pages before making the point that edits are promotional. 204.40.130.131 (talk) 15:03, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed the problems with neutrality and policy compliance at WP:ANI. You wrote there Multiple accounts were created because of a block on editing. That comes very close to an admission that you are evading a block. Consider this a formal warning that evading a block is forbidden, whether by using an IP address or by creating a new account. Please read Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. Anyone who engages in that misbehavior will be blocked and all dubious contributions will be removed. Blocked editors should read the Guide to appealing blocks and get unblocked before any further editing. Your report to ANI has led to greatly increased scrutiny of the article in question and any additions must be rigorously neutral and policy compliant. Cullen328 (talk) 18:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.