User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/mirrorPage
“ | Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. | ” |
— Hanlon's razor |
Some links about me
[edit]Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)
Low to moderate level of vandalism
[view • purge • update]
3.68 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 22:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes backlog
(review log)
Moderate backlog
[view • purge • update]
8 pages according to DatBot 23:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Qwerfjkl (talk · message · contribs · global contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · user creation · block user · block log · count · total · logs · summary · email | lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · spi · socks | rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp | current rights · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) | rights · renames · blocks · protects · deletions · rollback · admin · logs | UHx · AfD · UtHx · UtE)
Qwerfjkl (non-automated edits · api · block log · blocks · block user · central auth · COIBot · change rights · count · deleted contribs · deletions · email · filter log · edit summaries · Google · logs · list user · page moves · message · protections · RBLs · RDNS · renames · RfA · rights · sandbox · StopForumSpam · global contribs · global contribs · target logs · user creation · uploads · WHOIS · links to user page)
User essays worth reading
[edit](Copied from User:EEng)
- Wikipedia:Revert notification opt-out
- Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history)
- Wikipedia:Presentism
- User:Ritchie333/Hit and run editors
- WP:Lies Miss Snodgrass Told You
- WP:Wikipedia is not about whining
- WP:Principle of Some Astonishment
- WP:Diffusing conflict
- Wikipedia:Criticism -- re "Criticism", "Controversy" and similar sections
- User:Ritchie333#Zen and the art of Wikipedia Maintenance
This user feels physical pain when hearing others refer to Wikipedia as "Wiki". |
- See also
Quotes
[edit]These quotes are random, and will change if you purge the page. ( .)
<Ryan_Lane> are there docs for this anywhere?
<@^demon> Hahahahaha. You must be new here.
And from meta:IRC/Quotes:
(From #wikipedia-en-help)
<Dragonfly6-7> if [he] did not want public records to exist of him, he
should not have been a member of parliament
<Dragonfly6-7> I'm amused - earlier today we had someone who was very angry
that we were not agreeing to have an article on his friend who is an unelected
candidate for parliament
<Dragonfly6-7> and now, the opposite