Talk:Terror of the Zygons/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 16:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DoctorWhoFan91 (talk · contribs) 09:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one, the article seems very well written. I'll add remarks in an half an hour's time. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

which was the first broadcast in four weekly parts→which was first broadcast in four weekly parts Done
... and Harry Sullivan. It features the final regular appearances by Nicholas Courtney (as Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart) and by Marter.→and Harry Sullivan, with the episode featuring Marter's and Nicholas Courtney's (as Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart) final regular appearances. or any phrasing which lists Marter first Done

Production

Expand all three sub-sections, see Genesis of the Daleks#Production(GotD), not necessarily as long, but still need some expansion Done
- I don't see much expansion; is this the limit of info available about the production?
  - Yeah the references contain a lot of the same information over and over again. I'll try again and I may be able to squeeze out a little more content.
    - Try, but if there is no new info, that's okay; I'll still pass as is.

Broadcast and Reception

Write the viewer numbers and add AI values in a new paragraph(see GotD). Done
- Add something about the AI numbers?
Para 3: the amount of parentheses look weird, consider removing the years, as they are not necessary Done
- ?

References

Ref 3: Is Banks a typo of Barns, or is it not linked? Done
Ref 20: The SFX ref redirects, add usurped to status, so that .it links only to the archived version Done
Ref 21: A.V. Club ref is dead Done
Ref 27: Babelcolor does not seem reliable, find another ref Done
Per MOS: CONSISTENT, add wikilinks to all or none of the refs Done
- Ref 14, 18 and 19 are not wikilinked?

Overall

@OlifanofmrTennant: Article looks good, needs expansion in one section, and some minor changes. I'll do source spot-checking in my second read-through. It looks well on the way to GA. Good luck! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 10:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant I checked the references, and see no issues; the above comments are all the ones I have. (P.S.- You haven't responded here, and your only edit to the GAN was 10 days ago; if you could communicate if it's business or if you need to find more sources, that would be good?) DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been reletively busy. I'll wrap it up by the end of today Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{yo|I belive I should have fixed the noted issues. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: Umm, you haven't; remarked on the issues left. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoctorWhoFan91: Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: replied to the production expansion remark; ping when you are done (if you think there is no new info, just ping me and I'll pass the article) DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoctorWhoFan91: done Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: hey, it's been a week, just a reminder (in the unlikely case you forgot; not because of the time span, I know GANs take time) DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 19:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC) @OlifanofmrTennant: Passed the article; well done. Keep up the good work. 18:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·