Talk:Shah Budak/GA1

GA Review

Passed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Aintabli (talk · contribs) 02:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 14:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose review

You link Turkmen to Oghuz Turks here but to Turkoman (ethnonym) at Malik Arslan. Which is correct?
Answered in the other review.
succession - would accession be a better word?
Done
Shah Suwar crushed his brother near Zamantu Castle - he didn't crush his brother. His forces defeated those of his brother. Per WP:SLANG, we should present this in a more encyclopedic tone.
Zamantu Castle - Per Wikipedia:LEASTASTONISHMENT, Zamantu might be better unlinked; one would expect the article to be one on the castle.
Removed.
Shah Budak blinded Shahruh in retribution for the treatment his son Feyyaz had received in 1484. - No indication what this treatment was.
Changed to "defeated" and "overpowered".
worsting - ?
Ouster? Aintabli (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That works. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Generally, foreign language terms that have not been adapted to English should be italicized (see MOS:NON-ENG)
Done Aintabli (talk) 00:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

No images

Added custom map with a few labels for some of the towns mentioned in the text. Aintabli (talk) 00:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I just meant that to indicate that I've looked (in case things change down the line). That being said, the map looks excellent. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

All sources look to be reliable.
No close paraphrasing detected through Earwig.

Conclusion

Looks pretty good. I've made some edits; please review them. Only a few nitpicks to resolve. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that was a short and sweet review. Happy to pass this as a GA! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.