Jump to content

Talk:Sacrament of Transition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General comments

[edit]

I'm not mentioning this on the main wiki page because it wouldn't be apropriate or npov, but this is so nuts. it is beyond nuts, I don't care how many governments have signed off as being ok with it. Tranced what is this thing and what are all these peeps doing in it??? I am adding refs and the official government recognized religion links but it is still s-o n-u-t-s.

6Akira7 18:31, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

[edit]

I found this article in a state with quite a bit of apparent bias and speculation hostile to the subject, apparently with the intention of presenting it as a bizarre fringe element. This is inconsistent with WP:NPOV. If these allegations are true, you must cite them from external primary sources, not publish your own inferences (WP:OR). The SoT website also contains a number of elements that are whimsical, humorous, or considered fringe science... nonetheless you cannot present these in undue weight to cast the organization as a bunch of freaks without violating (WP:OR).

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sacrament of Transition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]