Jump to content

Talk:Patrick Ewing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Racist" antics by college fans were not really racist?

[edit]

I read the citations regarding what opposing fans did to Ewing in his college years. The "can't read" ones were in response to him allegedly not qualifying academically (was this confirmed one way or the other?). As for what happened in Syracuse, they are called the Orangemen so it's not surprising a Syracuse fan would throw an orange. Now if that had been a banana thrown OTOH...

Bottom line I don't believe either of these were racially motivated and the article should be adjusted accordingly.75.81.253.160 (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Ewing is American

[edit]

He was born in Kingston, Jamaica, and lived there until he was 11 or something, but then he moved the U.S. and after living there for so long he is now an American citizen (I don't know the specific chain of events). He played for the U.S. basketball team in both 1984 and 1992. 203.214.43.194 12:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok ok. he's a Jamaican-born American. the header makes that clear so i have reverted it back to your version. enough already. let's get back to editing and having a good time shall we? 24.148.74.156 09:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Knicks Won't Win with Ewing

[edit]

Though I don't have the news reports to back it up, during the Jordan eras the only thing I heard fron NY sports radio, and newspapers, was how the Knicks would never win a Championship while they had Ewing. He just wasn't good enough. Funny thing, as soon as he retires the Knicks stop making the playoffs. When he was there the Knicks were a perennial contender, as soon as he leaves they're a joke. Looks like those sports experts were a little mistaken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.238.49.65 (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Missing

[edit]

His picture is missing. 67.188.172.165 16:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Height

[edit]

Here Patrick admits he is 6'9. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/players/03/07/first_person0314/

MUTOMBO: [Sipping a virgin strawberry daiquiri] I like your restaurant, Yao. It's made for 7-footers and guys like Patrick Ewing, who is really 6'9". [Ewing has always been listed as 7 feet.]

EWING: Hey, I may be 6'9", but I'm a bad 6'9". And what about you? When I first met you, you told me you were from Zaire.

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pats middle name is spelled wrong.

[edit]

Its a disgrace... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.240.236 (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coaching his son

[edit]

wasn't sure whether to put it under coaching or with the rest of the information about Ewing Jr. Altarboy420 (talk) 00:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NBA's 50th Anniversary All-Time Team

[edit]

This isn't listed in his box for some reason. Help!

Bus pelted with rocks - probably not

[edit]

The article cited to support the "pelted with rocks" statement says the team bus was "frequently was rocked by opposing schools". That's not the same thing. Rocking a bus is not pelting it with rocks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.90.233.67 (talk) 17:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, I've adjusted the article. --SubSeven (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Patrick Ewing/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Downwards please get off Ewing's jock and stop deleting facts people add. Wikipedia policy is to add not delete facts.
"Wikipedia's policy is not to add delete facts?" What does that even mean? --Downwards 05:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 05:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 02:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patrick Ewing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's being reported that Ewing will be next HC of Georgetown, but it doesn't appear to be wholly substantiated. In light of that, I have added Template:Current to this article. pbp 19:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patrick Ewing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minutes per game

[edit]

Minutes per game during regular season are obviously wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.149.51.24 (talk) 21:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Patrick Ewing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox statistics

[edit]

What should be emphasized in Patrick Ewing's infobox career stats? User:Sabbatino insists on points, rebounds, assist being the standard and reverted User:Sorcererzthunder replacing blocks instead of assists, when there is no consensus for this arbitrary standard. If that was the case, Template:Infobox basketball biography would have hardwired them specifically. Ewing is more prolific as a shotblocker than a passer and this should be emphasized like in other articles of his peers like Dikembe Mutumbo, Hakeem Olajuwon, and David Robinson. Other examples of career statistic categories not being rigid in terms of pt, rb, ast are John Stockton and Alvin Robertson. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Morbidthoughts: It is a common knowledge in basketball that the main statistics are points, rebounds and assists. The statistics are listed in that order in about every basketball-related website. Many of the listings in Wikipedia have been done many years ago and editors listed whatever they wanted. You ought to start a discussion at WT:NBA since more people will see it there. – Sabbatino (talk) 18:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They may be the traditional triple double categories, but they do not establish the standard for listed categories in the infoboxes. The listed categories should be pertinent to their importance in the player's career. I will list this discussion on the project pages. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics like Blocks and Steals should be listed if the player was very prolific in that category. For example, Manute Bol averaged 3.3 bpg and he averaged 0.3 assists so definitely blocks should be listed as he was obviously more prolific with blocks. Also, if the NBA and Basketball-Reference keep track of the steals and blocks, they might as well should be allowed to be listed if a player was very good at doing either of those two. There isn't even a rule saying you can't list blocks or steals for stats here on wiki. Sorcererzthunder (talk) 20:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List all 5 categories, in one line (2 if it wraps), with no discrimination among the 5, and no other categories else, whenever possible. (For older players, only points and rebounds are available, for example.) Howard the Duck (talk) 06:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The current infobox template only allows for 3 statistical categories. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is Wikipedia. Howard the Duck (talk) 06:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hold on, I'm making a mock-up at that template's sandbox. Howard the Duck (talk) 06:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
LOL I can't make it work without screwing it up, and I don't wanna screw up even the sandbox. :p Howard the Duck (talk) 06:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it simple per MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE, and leave at three categories. I'm ambivalent if the same three categories are listed for all players. In either case, the body can have the standard career stat table, which shows more stats than the infobox.—Bagumba (talk) 14:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NBPA rep

[edit]

Why doesn't this page mention, anywhere, that Ewing was the president of the NBA players' union, especially during a lockout? Seems like pretty crucial information. 2601:14D:4480:9260:2961:2764:6E4D:9614 (talk) 00:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]