Talk:Nayib Bukele/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 23:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DeadlyRampage26 (talk · contribs) 00:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll do this review. It is a fairly long article so it will probably take a few weeks to review.DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 00:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is understandable to a broad audience. Appropriate number of wikilinks which do a good part to supplement this. Upon running prose through a few different spelling and grammar checker the prose seems to be fine, and I have fixed a few of the minor errors myself.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead section is decent, was concerned at first about the length, but upon reading MOS guidelines and considering the length of the entire prose, it seems appropriate. Lead section also provides a good overview of his political positions and philosophy, which is what most are here for. Layout complies with guidelines. See recommendations for Words to watch. Complies with the other MOS guidelines
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Questions

Ok, so first question is why are there so damn many spanish translations in the body? where is that required and does it need to really be after every single phrase he said? DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 00:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE, translations are only included when the text is not already in English, ie I translated it myself from an article in Spanish PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 03:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks man DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 09:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Recommendations List

There is a lot of 'which' as the operative. Examples would include 'which launched', 'which made' etc that grammar checkers are recommending change to 'that'.

I've changed every instance to "that" or reworded sentences to eliminate which. The only instance left is in the first sentence of the lead "[...] and the left-wing Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN), of which Bukele had previously been a member". PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 16:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 22:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per Words to Watch, I would recommend changing words like 'said' to something different. MOS:SAID, MOS:OP-ED