Jump to content

Talk:Monster Bash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unreferenced?

[edit]

I'm not sure why this article is marked as unreferenced. What reference does it need (as of now, considering the information it has) but the game itself? I thought that non-verifiable things needed referecing, not easily verifiable ones. And if there is something that needs a reference, it should be marked as such. Otherwise, I think the tag should be removed. Sega381 20:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I love this game

[edit]

I used to play it ALL the time, brings back a flood of nostalgia. I must've played it around 1994-96 so much fun, good times. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.49.155.106 (talk) 16:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Horror Convention?

[edit]

Isn't Monster Bash a horror convention is PA? If so can/should I make a page for it?Joe Momma93: Game On 01:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it's notable. Miranda 01:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Monsterbash.JPG

[edit]

Image:Monsterbash.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Points for no-hit bonus?

[edit]

The article mentions four bonuses, but in only three cases are the points awarded (50,000 in each case) mentioned. Does this mean that nobody has ever achieved the no-hit bonus to confirm its score? :-) I've tried to get this bonus several times and each time failed, leading me to conclude that it's probably impossible, at least for me. 217.171.129.70 (talk) 22:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Points game guide material?

[edit]

How is game guide material mentioning that in the gameplay the player is supposed to get points? I understand that a list of the collectables or the feats can be game guide material, but simply explaining that part of the game is supposed to collect points? I don't get it.--Sega381 (talk) 22:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The added material seemed to be more then just 'points'. But heck, too much of the article is game guide material. Lots42 (talk) 03:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Could you point me to an article for a similar game which doesn't have game guide material, to use as an example or parameter?--Sega381 (talk) 04:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]