Jump to content

Talk:Megakaryocyte

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment upgrade

[edit]

re: below, this shouldn't be start class anymore surely? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.100.120 (talk) 22:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How

[edit]

How is this an immunology stub ? It should be cell biology or something like that. I dunno how you guys classify these. --Lord Anubis 05:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, although related to immunology i would not place it in this category, also a better picture like an electron micrograph would be good.

Assessment upgrade

[edit]

How much more would it take to move this article from Start to grade B? (Sedmic) 21:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're already there. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

doi:10.1111/bjh.12758, a review of the cellular and molecular processes mediating platelet formation JFW | T@lk 16:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bumper issue

[edit]

Blood this week has a series of articles about megakaryocytes. JFW | T@lk 14:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Megakaryocyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Megakaryocyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of "automated digital image analysis" mention?

[edit]

On February 11th, user Johannes A. Schmidt added a mention of an article he seems to be an author of (as well as a freeware), and did a similar modification on the platelet article. The modification is [[1]], and the quoted article is here.

I think that the comment is too precise to be relevant for the article, and would require user Johannes A. Schmidt to give more details about the relevance of this comment if he wishes to maintain it. I'll delete it if I get no comment. Lboukoko (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the refspam and the the subseqent bit which was plain old spam. Jytdog (talk) 16:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]