Jump to content

Talk:Lori Wick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lori Wick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability & Where This Article Fits

[edit]

She is significant within her genre, so I think this information needs to be somewhere but I do not know where. Based on the Teahouse Discussion, it does not seem like the article meets guidelines for a biography or author page. However, just because it does not have enough coverage it does not seem right to take it out entirely. I think it just needs help finding its place. Suggestions? If I understand the top of the Talk Page it does not seem like it is enough for any of those other literary sections either. - MysticalFairyAstha (talk) 06:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

She might be notable based on her inclusion in secondary sources; apparently there is a bit of criticism of her works, as summarised in Tischler's book, and that could also be a sign of notability, if it can only be found and discussed in the article. I'm on the fence about this one - I'm not convinced she's notable per the notability guidelines for authors or those for all biographies, but I'm also not sure she isn't. --bonadea contributions talk 16:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]