Talk:Kitab-ı Bahriye/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Rjjiii (talk · contribs) 03:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: LEvalyn (talk · contribs) 23:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to learning a great deal about this book! When I review, I typically make relatively small tweaks myself and just leave comments about bigger-picture items, though of course as always with editing you should feel to modify any changes I may make. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Prose

I think the "History" section might be more accurately titled "Composition", since that is primarily what it explains. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done, Rjjiii (ii) (talk) 03:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relatedly, the paragraph that begins with The details in a portolan chart... seems like it would fit better in the next section, since it explains the contents of the book. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done, Rjjiii (ii) (talk) 03:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

I like to check a random 10 or 10% of the sources (whichever is more). For this article, I'll check sources 5, 9, 12, 18, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, and 35, as they're numbered in this diff. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much for taking on the review. Let me know if you need quotes or scans from any of the sources. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 03:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LEvalyn: pinging because I forgot to {{ping}} on the offer above, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and my apologies on the delay here! First, regarding sources — I have access to a quite good library so I am generally able to access sources on my own, but if I have any trouble I’ll let you know. Thanks for offering! Second, regarding my delay — again, my apologies; I had a busier week than I expected, which has prevented me from dedicating time to this review. I now have a quite busy weekend ahead of me so it would likely be Tuesday before I can pick this up again. That’s pretty slow to leave you waiting, so if you like, I could throw this one back in the pool and see if someone else bites. Just let me know. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 05:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good; I can wait a week, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 14:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]