Jump to content

Talk:K-3 (Kansas highway)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:K-3 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 17:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • In the route description, you begin two consecutive sentences with "North of". One of these should be changed.
      Yeah, I used that transition too often. Fixed.
    • The sentence "After this intersection, the highway crosses the Little Osage River, then leaves Bourbon County and enters Linn County." sounds awkward. I would remove the mention of leaving Bourbon County because by stating it is entering Linn County, you are already implying it is leaving the previous county mentioned.
      Rewritten.
    • "By 1950, the portion of K-3 in Crawford County had been paved, leaving the remainder of the route yet to be improved" I don't see the need for the rest of the sentence after the comma since that is already implied.
      I guess that is pretty redundant. Axed.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Can some more historical details be added to the lead?
    Did the best I can. There's not the greatest amount of history on this.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few small fixes to be made. Dough4872 17:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have addressed all of your issues. TCN7JM 20:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I will now pass the article. Dough4872 21:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]