Jump to content

Talk:Go Deep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

3:57

[edit]

3 minutes and 57 seconds into the song, Janet sings an ad-lib that fans like me have been trying to decipher. I don't know if it deserves to be mentioned in the article, it's just a thought. - Jjmcspooh 00:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

so have i Stopitplease92 21:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Go Deep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Go Deep/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Binksternet (talk · contribs) 19:45, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since 2015, I have made a handful of reverts at this article, but I have not made any significant edits, so I am not disqualified as a reviewer. Review in progress... Binksternet (talk) 19:45, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More review to come. Binksternet (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • The bit about Manila and the Philippines is not about the song... removing as off-topic.
  • I'm adding Flyte Tyme as a studio, and Elizondo as secret husband on lyrics. I'm removing "lyrically" where it was redundant. I'm removing too many instances of "also". Other copyediting for concision and grammar. The phrase "pulsing erotic groover" uses the made-up word "groover" as a noun, not an adjective, and it was not from Billboard. The concept of cameo appearance in film does not include early roles by relatively unknown actors who later became famous.
  • I'm removing funk as a genre element, because the great majority of reviews don't mention it. I'm leaving it in quotes wherever it appears.
  • I'm removing all those archived newspaper.com URLs, and the ones for Google Books that don't work for the reader. Binksternet (talk) 19:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was horrified to see some copyright violation in the music video description, with much of the text taken straight from the Dozier book, or otherwise too-closely paraphrased from the same book. I reworked the music video description because of that huge problem. I also added a bit about the Smashing Pumpkins song "1979" also having Snorricam shots by the same directors. Binksternet (talk) 23:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • A bot fixed the size of the too-large non-free image. I uploaded a new version of the audio listening example and it doesn't have the stray sound. The article is getting close to GA. I'll spend some more time checking it out tomorrow. Binksternet (talk) 05:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review! Alex reach me! 19:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]