Jump to content

Talk:Geomedia Inc.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

COI

[edit]

In accordance with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, I have chosen to disclose that I have a personal connection to this subject. I will spare details, but my main purpose in writing this article is to benefit Wikipedia and its mission. I believe this list is written from a neutral perspective (the content is pretty non-controversial) and has been constructed from independent, reliable sources. The second link above provides the following summary, which I believe I have followed appropriately:

  • Be transparent about your conflict of interest ( Done)
  • Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources. ( Done)
  • Your role is to inform and reference, not promote or sell. ( Done)
  • Be extremely cautious about the risks of editing articles about yourself or your clients ( Done|N/A)
  • If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject. ( Done)
  • State facts and statistics, don't be vague or general. ( Done)
  • Take time to get sources and policy right. ( Done)
  • Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your draft. ( Doing...)
  • Work with the community and we'll work with you. ( Done)
  • Communicate, communicate, communicate. ( Done)

My goal is to have this article promoted to Good article status, eventually. I understand this will require review and assistance from other members of the community, which is great. I invite all to examine this list carefully to make sure the content is fair and accurate. Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

as an editor with COI, you are supposed to be editing only the talk page; nobody with coi can be a good judge of the appropriateness of their edits. DGG ( talk ) 13:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of giving me a lecture about COI editing and my so-called lack of judgement (by the way, I have promoted COI articles to Good and Featured status), can we please remain focused on the article's content itself? ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All this is for other people to judge; with a coi you cannot be an adequate judge of the work you are connected with. DGG ( talk ) 18:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, your assertion that I am unable to judge my own work or disagree with changes made to an article is insulting. I would be posting these same disagreements regardless of the COI. It is not unusual to ask editors to justify why they are removing content. I am using this page to discuss changes made to the article, so if you have specific issues with the article's content, let's please discuss them here. Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]