Talk:Cargo 200 (code name)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cargo 200 (code name) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Culture / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Russia Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

“Zinc-lined coffins”

Is tsinkovyi grob (“zinc coffin”) properly translated as “galvanized steel coffin,” or “galvanized steel-lined coffin”? In Russian, galvanizing is tsinkovainie, literally zincing. —Michael Z. 19:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Website nonfunctional

The website is down, and apparently leads to some gambling website. Please use Wayback Machine. 67.169.138.27 (talk) 14:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is there a code for ordering new soldiers?

in german bundeswehr there was one, but I forgot it.... 84.191.14.113 (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 October 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Cargo 200 (code name) be renamed and moved to Cargo 200.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Cargo 200 (code name) → Cargo 200 – it is an invalid disambig page with only two meanings --Altenmann >talk 23:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever it is that the nominator was trying to say, there is no rule that says a disambiguation page needs to have more than two entries. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 04:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is: WP:ONEOTHER. Cargo 200 (code name) is clearly a primary topic; the film is named after it. --Altenmann >talk 18:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ONEOTHER doesn't say that a disambiguation page needs to have more than two entries. It only says that a disambiguation page is not necessary if there are only two topics and one of them is a primary topic for the term. Being the original source of a term does not make a topic automatically primary, but perhaps the code name is primary in this instance. There is a third topic: 200rf.com (aka Look for Your Own). Its launch in February 2022 seems to have been responsible for a big spike in interest in March 2022 (echoed a year later in March 2023). It gets about 11% of the page views of the three topics combined. The code name gets about 52% and the film gets about 37%. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

200rf does not belong to this disambig page; the name not nearly close, and I removed it. --Altenmann >talk 01:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning support. I agree with the removal of 200rf.com, which obliquely alludes to the disambiguated term, but is not the term, and I tend to agree that Cargo 200 (code name) is the primary topic of the term based on relative historical importance. BD2412 T 18:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]