Jump to content

Talk:Bob Ferguson (politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reads like a campaign ad

[edit]

This article reads like a campaign ad — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.21.180.194 (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I quite agree. I made some small edits. Someone with some time should work on this further. Some obvious issues:
  • "4th generation Washingtonian" does not belong in lede
  • "Washington native" section could be condensed into a less hype-y more normal section on family background & youth.
  • "He anxiously awaits the return of a competitive Seattle Mariners baseball team": not exactly encyclopedic tone. To put it mildly.
  • "Ferguson worked with the legal team that successfully defended taxpayers from paying for cost overruns associated with Safeco Field construction." That looks like something from a resume (especially the part about "successfully defended taxpayers").
- Jmabel | Talk 01:27, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes from papers

[edit]

I had removed the quotes from the seven different newspapers and just kept the references to support the sentence "Numerous daily newspaper in Washington state editorialized against Stutzman’s refusal to sell flowers for the same sex wedding and supported of the Attorney General’s efforts to enforce the law." However they have since been added back in. I don't think they are necessary especially considering that they are not about Ferguson. If there is support here to do so, they should be removed again. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2017

[edit]

In the Comcast lawsuit section, there is a line "...filed over 1.8 individual violations..." that should be "...filed over 1.8 million individual violations...", as per the cited article. The word "millions" should be added to amend the statement. (http://www.seattletimes.com/business/technology/washington-state-to-sue-comcast-over-pattern-of-deceptive-practices/) 2001:4898:80E8:5:0:0:0:71E (talk) 00:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Gulumeemee (talk) 04:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Bob Ferguson (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

but they're dead

[edit]

Hey Trappist the monk! Looks like your recent edit removed url-status=dead from several references that really are dead. Why is that? -- mikeblas (talk) 16:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous. In cs1|2, the presence of |archive-url= with an assigned value tells the template that the value assigned to |url= is dead. Explicitly saying that a dead thing is dead is superfluous. Examples:
with |url-status=dead
{{cite book |title=Title |url=https://example.com |archive-url=https://archive.org |archive-date=2024-08-20 |url-status=dead}}
Title. Archived from the original on 2024-08-20.
without |url-status=dead
{{cite book |title=Title |url=https://example.com |archive-url=https://archive.org |archive-date=2024-08-20}}
Title. Archived from the original on 2024-08-20.
Both renderings are identical.
For more about |url-status= see the template docs.
Trappist the monk (talk) 16:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I guess readers of the documentation are meant to infer that "the archived link is displayed first" means that the archive URL will be used in the link rather than the original url. I didn't make that assumption. What harm does the extra specification cause? -- mikeblas (talk) 14:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]