Talk:Antiscience

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antiscience article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Science Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of science

Anti-science not necessarily means anti-intellectualism t

It should be more objective to say: Anti-science is a set of attitudes involves a rejection of current science, or current scientific method, or current scientific practice, or current scientific consensus. Interestingly, Skepticism is consider one of important element in science. Science is evolving, one reject current science may accept future science, or vice versa. Cloud29371 (talk) 02:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can't reject future science, because we don't know what that will be. Science evolves, every learned person knows this.

But, to the point: highly intellectual professors, who are postmodernists, usually distrust science. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]