Jump to content

Talk:5566

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:5566 (band))

True or false??

[edit]

True or false: this article belongs at 5566 (boyband) in that it doesn't follow the rule that articles made entirely of digits 0-9 are meant to be about in Wikipedia. 66.245.30.55 19:21, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

A strange world indeed

[edit]

5566's fans come from all parts of the world, eg. Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan, Korea, China, Indonesia, etc.

By popular definition, I would suggest that "all parts of the world" means places on more than one continent, in this case Asia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.215.208.5 (talk) 08:13, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From main article

[edit]

Reposting here:

Uniqueness/Characteristics

[edit]

Lastly, some notes to mention about this great band is that they like, or dislike, the following:

1. They don't like to sing live in front of audience who are 12-15 years old girls.

2. They like to lip-sync and pretend to be really singing, no wonder they sound perfect all the way, even when the microphone is off their mouths.

3. They like to take awards at every country because it proof that they are popular, even though they are not really talented at all.

4. Like to act happy and really enjoying theirselves in a foreign country. When asked their favourite country, they will never mentioned their home country Taiwan.

5. Likes to compare themselves with other bands who are significantly better, for example Wu Yue Tian. After comparing, they will say that they are better because they don't know anything, and is still popular.

6. They really love lip-syncing.but they have good voice(zax wang &tony sun espl) See WP:POV and WP:CITE for why I removed it. --Petros471 15:52, 19 December 2005 (UTC) PS. Would have re-posted sooner if internet connection hadn't gone down.[reply]

Few facts, whole load of controversy

[edit]

Whoever had that much time to type that controversy section up should also contribute to their musical development history.

Well, if you happen to know about their music development history, feel free to add on.-Pandacomics 22:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from starting work on their history, I have also altered the controversy section; giving too much negative detail is pointless and neg-POV. I myself support 5566's music, so there might be something in my contribution that will shed them in a positive light. Please point them out should it happen. Ytlow 12:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure you cite anything you write. I know it's kinda hard to find things in Chinese, but Wikipedia will consider the entire content baseless if we don't cite anything. See Jay Chou and S.H.E for citing examples. Arsonal 04:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The content about Rio Peng and K-One is based off my educated guess, and the content about 183 Club "replacing" 5566 (see 2004 and 2005) is agreed by quite a few people, and although official sources exist about that speculation, they might be a little hard to find. When I have time, I'll gather a few sources, then maybe someone could put them up for me. (I'm not that familiar with the references thing) ytlow 11:05, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cyndi Wang

[edit]

Does anyone know if she's still in Jungiery or out of? If out of, when did she leave? Ytlow 12:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She's still with them, but only for dramas. She has a recording contract with Avex. - Pandacomics 05:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:P27.jpg

[edit]

Image:P27.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved, with a stipulation that this discussion is revisited in the 56th century. @harej 01:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]



5566 (band)55665566 redirects to 5566 (band), no need for the disambiguation. — ξxplicit 03:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 5566. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]