Draft talk:WePlanet
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
taking into account the feedback from Alpha3031 about the previous version that was published in may 2024
[edit]THe original article contained only references ot articles from mainstream media ( The Guardian , Wall Street Journal) that were positive about WePlanet or the ecomodernist movement.
These articles were written by independent journalists which are not related to the Weplanet orgnaization, so they are entirely valid as secondary sources to assess the notability of WePlanet . The fact that they are mostly positive does not invalidate the notability aspect, because it cannot be assumed that these journalists from such well-known media were biased in writing in such a way.
I have added different viewpoints, also from secondary sources, in the first section of this new version. Steyncham (talk) 14:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)