Jump to content

Talk:Erika Jayne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Erika Jayne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first archive doesn't have the correct article, but the second one does work. Leangle30 (talk) 21:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please do not add text from sources, such as Erika Jayne's Bio page at aceshowbiz, unless you put that content into your own words AND give sources for the information added to the article. Wikipedia has a very clear copyright violation policy in effect. And, besides, if you look at the bottom of that page, AceShowbiz has a clear copyright notice. The text that was in the Wikipedia article, from

a classically trained pianist... [to] ...I knew I wanted to be a performer."

It is almost word-for-word of what appears at the AceShowbiz website. (FYI, that site is on some sort of a WP blacklist - I don't know why.) Shearonink (talk) 05:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Erika Jayne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Soc314: Wikipedia Critique an Article Assignment

[edit]

This is simply for a school assignment, but I have a couple suggestions for the page. Perhaps it would be better if some of the claims were more neutral. For instance, "Jayne has received praise for her stage presence and voice during live performances" and the citation used is potentially problematic. The source is a random blog post/list, but I guess it may not matter because multiple obscure blog posts could be evident of her fan base. Another sentence, "She soon became a fan favorite on the show and her appearance was well received by the public" has similar implications as the aforementioned sentence. The source was from an E! journalist, who may not be representative of the entire Real Housewives' viewership. Overall this is a well written article and I would like to see a photograph of Erika to be featured in the article. Mikerep (talk) 20:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The article reads like a publicity piece, working from far too many poor and promotional sources.

One of the first problems to address is her notability, which is almost lost among all the trivia. I've made some initial attempts to address this in the lede as a start. --Ronz (talk) 16:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Over Writing

[edit]

This page is complete crap - this woman's life prior to approx 2014 is not of any importance. This page goes on and on about a woman who is a nobody and who was not even a public figure until a few years ago when she went on a reality show in her late 40s. Up until that point she was a housewife and wikipedia doesn't report on reguolar housewives or everyone in the world would have a page. All of this information is irrelevant and broad. What is missing is recent legal events on public record related to this woman being sued for 15 million dollars in two lawsuits. That's of public significance yet fails to appear on this page.

This page seriously needs cleaned up or deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:540:C400:2CA6:18CF:88D7:5451:5CAE (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2021

[edit]

The page states that Ms. Jayne met Tom Girardi at Chasen’s in 1997; Chasen’s closed on April 1, 1995. 172.89.173.148 (talk) 12:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —Sirdog (talk) 15:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing With The Stars

[edit]

Hello! Could someone who is better at editing Wikipedia than I am please update the article to include that she participated in Season 24 of Dancing With The Stars? I came here looking for info about that and thought I had imagined it, but it was just missing from the article. PupGoomba (talk) 21:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]