This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The article provides a false information about Tommy Robinson. He is not anti Islam, he is anti extremists Jihadists. He was wrongly accused and then was released from prison without the charge! Facts are available and proper journalists can allocate it. Do your research and provide facts before publishing such a gross misinformation! 194.223.185.245 (talk) 06:03, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: Wikipedia presents a neutral point of view based on how the subject is described in reliable sources. Do you have reliable sources that can corroborate the idea that he is not anti Islam or at least evidence a proportionate viewpoint that counters this view? CloakedFerret (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In this interview with Jordan Peterson he describes growing up a multi faith community. From approx. 36:40 onwards he make it clear that he is anti islamist.
Your sources are not reliable though. You cannot use the rantings of extremely biased left-wing journalists as a reliable source in this "impartial" article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.160.225 (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tommy Robinson is a proud Zionist so not Far Right
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I understand how this page came to this conclusion. This label of Far Right follows Tommy Robinson from common knowledge to Main stream media. However it's not correct. He has stuck up for Jewish people's rights for protection in the U.K. even before October 7 2023 and he's a proud Zionist as he himself has said in at least one more recent interview. This is also common knowledge to the point he is constantly accused of working for the Israeli government. As well as he is hated by actual far right groups for the same reason & also because he admits to having friends of all colors that he has known his whole life. I understand political terminology is not grounded in facts as much as it used to be but him being a proud Zionist should be enough to have Far Right removed. I'll do the work and list the links with time stamps if needed but if there was any unbiased research done in the first place you would know this already. Wikipedia used to represent truth based in factual evidence. What counts as proof for an edit these days? Weymouth77 (talk) 23:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Published reliable sources? How many of those reliable sources use Anonymous sources these days?Are they still all that reliable. The man did a documentary with the teachers and children involved with the liable case from the Syrian boy who was "waterboarded" If they don't count as reliable sources and the person who this page is based on own words don't count as reliable then what's the point? I bet if it was an admittion of guilt that would count. It's my fault I should've read the other edit requests first. I would've known I was wasting my time. And maybe since he is a proud Zionist that doesn't work in his favor here. Or maybe I'm wrong. Either way it's another one of life's learned experiences for me. Actual truth based in facts has no place in today's Wikipedia. One thing based in facts is if Wikipedia editors can't be unbiased then they shouldn't be anywhere near an editing gig on a site that claims to be based in facts.I really don't mean to come off like an a**hole. But every main stream media has it's own goals and political views. That's what used to make Wikipedia great. The people could show their proof and let the readers decide. You have better things to do than read my words. I don't envy your job. Not by today's rules. I hope you have a good night or day and wish you nothing but health and happiness. Thank you for your time and help. Weymouth77 (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
Not done: Wikipedia presents a neutral point of view based on how the subject is described in reliable sources. Do you have reliable sources that can corroborate the idea that he is not anti Islam or at least evidence a proportionate viewpoint that counters this view? CloakedFerret (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)